Managing competing priorities requires more than deciding which work matters most. High-performing teams create practical ways to allocate attention, make deliberate trade-offs, and keep important work moving as priorities and conditions change.  

This assessment provides leaders, project and program managers, and professionals working across multiple projects with a practical framework for evaluating how effectively their teams manage attention in volatile work environments.  

Download the assessment to evaluate whether your team has the practices needed to:  

  • Reduce reactive reprioritization as new requests arrive  
  • Make clearer trade-offs between competing commitments  
  • Limit unnecessary context switching across multiple projects  
  • Establish greater visibility into active work and changing priorities  
  • Keep critical work moving as conditions change  

The assessment focuses on the practices that support intentional execution, including portfolio visibility, recurring review, explicit attention decisions, focus protection, and clear responses to new and urgent requests.  

It also helps leaders identify whether changing priorities are creating unnecessary attention churn and whether teams have a repeatable approach for deciding what deserves attention now, what can wait, and what does not require an immediate reaction.  

The result is a clearer picture of how effectively your team translates organizational priorities into day-to-day execution and where more intentional attention allocation can strengthen performance across multiple projects.